Citibank is concentrating on the wrong figures

Citibank has got to the worst run place in America and I’m not talking about the huge bail-out money they took last year to stay afloat. I’m not even referring to the fact they bumped the APR on our credit card up to 30% last year although we had never been late on a payment. What I am referring to is the fact that they fired some chick for being too hot. Apparently Vikram Pandit can’t do anything right when it comes to running a company, his stock is trading around $3.50 a share (down about $1.50 since they fired this hot chick) and he takes a salary of $1 per year and now doesn't even have any eye-candy for his trouble.


Debralee Lorenzana says she was fired for dressing too provocatively to the point her male colleagues couldn’t focus on crunching numbers and instead focusing on crunching the 5’6” Latina in her 3” pumps and tight tops. There are thousands of people who claim they are discriminated to for being unattractive or overweight which I can see but for being a smoking hot chick is outrageous.

Now I have banking buddies who say that they have yet to see a picture of her looking ‘THAAAAAAT Hot” so apparently there are tons of hot-chicks running around some of the biggest banks in NYC which may explain why they all took TARP money since those boob-jobs gotta be paid by some body. These guys may say that she isn’t that hot but I know for sure that when this chick walks onto a subway car, every head turns. She’s easily Jessica Lopez hot, she’s easily Jessica Simpson hot, the question is if she is Jessica Rabbit hot?

But the more I think about it this is where Citi has it wrong; they should have moved this chick from the back-offices to a teller job or maybe put her in charge of the annual fundraising car-wash. Actually forget that she should be put up on every bill-board in NYC with a slogan like “Citibank, yeah we took a bailout but at least we got hot-chicks.”