Take on the Royal wedding

I saw a poll last week which indicated that neither Brits or Americans were all that interested in the Royal Wedding but it was all anybody spoke about yesterday. Maybe it was that we all do love the idea of a princess getting married or it was a much needed reprieve from school shootings, school bus crashes and the prospects of Turner and Mooch We caught about twenty minutes of it. Here is our quick take from earlier today

- it would have been nice had they out this thing on at a reasonable hour. 7am on a Saturday?!? Get this puppy into a US prime-time slot or at least at noon.

- the preacher was interesting but Jesus, what the hell was he talking about ten minutes into it a bit the Fire?!?

-where the hell did they duck our for twenty minutes. Confessing a laundry list of sins?


- people say that Meghan Markle's dress was understated..do you realize it had a fifty foot train?? Although ballsy to go white

- a bunch of people wondered whether two random royals would wear ridiculous hats, Princess Beatrice and the other one. I have no idea but both could stand to lose ten stone and it would be nice if maybe one of them could smile

-apparently Harry's ex showed up, not sure how that is ever a good idea. Not on Royal Wedding day, not at the chapel at the Mirage

- a bunch of nice Diana moments but when I heard some commentator say that the ceremony had white roses because that was her favorite..you are sort of gasping for straws. It's a wedding

- everybody commented that Harry was such a gentleman for opening that door of the classic car and Markle for leaning over for him. This was fully choreographed people.

- love the tableau of a gospel choir in a church surrounded by the most stuffy people in the world going through endless pomp and circumstance.

- I didn't hear a peep out of Prince George or Princess Charlotte and they didn't show them during the ceremony. Probably because they both had iPads which I commend